Fair Housing Board v. Windsor Plaza Condominium Association

768 S.E.2d 79 (2014)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Fair Housing Board v. Windsor Plaza Condominium Association

Virginia Supreme Court
768 S.E.2d 79 (2014)

RW

Facts

The Windsor Plaza Condominium Association (defendant) deeded parking spaces in the condominium's garage to individual apartment owners. After Michael Fishel bought and moved into one of the apartments, he discovered that he could not maneuver his wheelchair into or out of his parking space. Fishel asked the association's board to make some reasonable accommodation to address his need for handicapped-accessible parking. The board told Fishel that it could not do so, because the garage's few handicapped-accessible spaces belonged to individuals and were not under the board's control. Fishel proposed converting the garage's bicycle-storage area into an accessible parking space. The board responded that it was unwilling to make the necessary physical modifications and suggested that Fishel use on-street handicapped parking, which Fishel said was too dangerous because of local traffic conditions. The board arranged with the owner of one of the garage's handicapped-accessible spaces to let Fishel use the space, but Fishel rejected the arrangement because it did not give him ownership of the space. Fishel complained to federal and state authorities that the board's actions violated federal and state fair-housing statutes. Virginia's Fair Housing Board (FHB) (plaintiff) sued the condominium association, but the trial court dismissed the case. The FHB appealed to the Supreme Court of Virginia.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Goodwyn, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 777,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 777,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 777,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership