Fair Housing Council of San Fernando Valley v. Roommate.com, LLC
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
666 F.3d 1216 (2012)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Roommate.com, LLC (defendant) operated a website where individuals could post information about themselves, including sex, sexual orientation, and familial status, to assist in their search for a roommate. The Fair Housing Councils of San Fernando Valley and San Diego (plaintiffs) brought suit, alleging among other things that Roommate.com’s website was discriminatory in violation of the Fair Housing Act (FHA). The FHA prohibits discrimination on the basis of "race, color, sex, familial status, or national origin" with respect to the rental or sale of a "dwelling." The FHA defines "dwelling," in turn, as "any building, structure, or portion thereof which is occupied as, or designed or intended for occupancy as, a residence by one or more families." The district court granted the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment, finding that Roommate.com violated the FHA by prompting users to enter discriminatory preferences, matching users based on those preferences, and publishing the preferences. The district court enjoined Roommate.com from continuing those practices. Roommate.com appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Kozinski, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.