Fairfax County Redevelopment and Housing Authority v. Worcester Brothers Co.

257 Va. 382 (1999)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Fairfax County Redevelopment and Housing Authority v. Worcester Brothers Co.

Virginia Supreme Court
257 Va. 382 (1999)

JL

Facts

The Fairfax County Redevelopment and Housing Authority (defendant) awarded a construction contract to Worcester Brothers Co. (plaintiff) in 1995. Under the contract, the project should have been substantially complete by mid-February 1996. However, the housing authority failed to obtain necessary clearances for a significant portion of the work, causing a substantial delay. Worcester Brothers sued the housing authority, seeking to recover damages incurred as a result of the delay. Worcester Brothers submitted evidence of incurring over $46,000 in direct expenses based on the delay, and Worcester Brothers sought recovery of a portion of its overhead expenses, also called home-office expenses. Although Worcester Brothers did not specifically allocate overhead expenses to each construction project in its accounting system, Worcester Brothers requested over $34,000 in overhead expenses, based on the Eichleay formula. The Eichleay formula provides a reasonable approximation of overhead expenses attributable to a construction project by averaging those expenses out. The trial court agreed and awarded the requested damages to Worcester Brothers. The housing authority appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Koontz, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership