Fairmount Glass Works v. Crunden-Martin Woodenware Co.

106 Ky. 659, 51 S.W. 196 (1899)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
F
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Fairmount Glass Works v. Crunden-Martin Woodenware Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
106 Ky. 659, 51 S.W. 196 (1899)

CH
Fairmount Glass Works v. Crunden-Martin Woodenware Co.

Facts

On April 20, 1895, Crunden-Martin Woodenware Company (Crunden-Martin) (plaintiff) wrote to Fairmount Glass Works (Fairmount) (defendant) asking for the lowest price at which Fairmount would sell ten car loads of Mason jars. On April 23, 1895, Fairmount sent a letter with a “quote” of prices “for immediate acceptance.” The next day, April 24, 1895, Crunden-Martin sent a telegram asking that the order be entered as specified in the quotation. Fairmount responded that same day stating that the order could not be filled. Crunden-Martin sued Fairmount alleging that a binding contract had been formed when Crunden-Martin sent the telegram accepting the prices in Fairmount’s April 23, 1895 letter. Fairmount argued in defense that a binding contract had not been formed by Crunden-Martin’s April 24, 1895 telegram, and consequently Fairmount had the right to decline to fill the order. The trial court entered judgment for Crunden-Martin, and Fairmount appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hobson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 807,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Contracts

Key Terms