Fall River Gas Appliance Company v. Commissioner
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
349 F.2d 515 (1965)
- Written by Heather Whittemore, JD
Facts
Fall River Gas Company was the exclusive distributor of natural gas in Fall River, Massachusetts. Fall River Gas Appliance Company (the appliance company) (plaintiff) was a subsidiary of Fall River Gas Company that leased and installed gas appliances. The appliance company would install gas appliances or conversion kits, and it leased the appliances for an initial one-year period. Customers could request the removal of the conversion kits at will. When appliance leases ended, the appliance company would remove the appliances or conversion kits. The appliance company paid for the installations and received money from customers through rental payments and the consumption of gas. The appliance company classified its installation costs as business expenses. The United States Tax Court held that the expenditures were capital expenditures, not business expenses, because the appliance company received a benefit—the rental fees and gas purchases—from the installation of the appliances for longer than a year. The appliance company appealed, arguing that due to the impermanent nature of the appliances, a customer could stop using gas at any point after an installation. Therefore, the appliance company was not assured that customers would maintain their appliance rentals and gas consumption for periods long enough to classify the installation costs as capital expenditures.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lewis, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.