Fan v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

117 T.C. 32 (2001)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Fan v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
117 T.C. 32 (2001)

Facts

Stephen Fan (plaintiff) was a dentist who owned a small business that provided dental services. Some of Fan’s patients were hearing impaired, such that Fan communicated with them through the use of handwritten notes. Using this method, Fan was able to provide dental services to hearing-impaired patients. But Fan found that communicating through the use of handwritten notes was time consuming. Thus, Fan purchased equipment that allowed him to communicate more efficiently with hearing-impaired patients. On his income tax return, Fan claimed a tax credit for the purchase of the equipment. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) (defendant) determined that Fan was not entitled to a tax credit. Fan challenged the IRS’s determination in the United States Tax Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Carluzzo, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership