Fantasy, Inc. v. Fogerty
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
94 F.3d 553 (1996)
- Written by Cynthia (Anderson) Beeler, JD
Facts
John Fogerty (defendant) was the lead singer of the band Creedence Clearwater Revival and the author of the song “The Old Man Down the Road” (Old Man). Fogerty had previously authored “Run Through The Jungle” (Jungle), a song for which the copyright was later owned by Fantasy, Incorporated (Fantasy) (plaintiff). Both Old Man and Jungle were written in a style referred to as swamp rock. Fantasy sued Fogerty for copyright infringement of Jungle based on similarities between it and Old Man. At trial, a jury found Fogerty not liable for copyright infringement. The district court denied Fogerty attorney’s fees, based on circuit precedent allowing a defendant to recover attorney’s fees only if the plaintiff was culpable in its conduct in bringing or prosecuting the suit. Fogerty appealed, and the circuit court affirmed the district court’s holding on the issue of attorney’s fees. The Supreme Court granted Fogerty’s petition for a writ of certiorari. The Court reversed the circuit court’s holding and remanded the case for further proceedings. The circuit court then remanded the case to the district court. The district court held that Fogerty should be awarded attorney’s fees in the amount of $1,347,519.15, but the district court held he should not receive prejudgment interest. Fantasy appealed imposition of attorney’s fees, and Fogerty cross-appealed the denial of prejudgment interest.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Rymer, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.