Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Farag v. United States

United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York
587 F. Supp. 2d 436 (2008)


Facts

On August 22, 2004, Tarik Farag and Amro Elmasry (plaintiffs), both Arabs, flew from San Diego to New York. Both men were born in Egypt, but Farag had lived in the United States since 1971 and was an American citizen, and Elmasry had a valid U.S. visa. When Farag and Elmasry got off the plane in New York, at least 10 armed officers with police dogs frisked, handcuffed, and arrested them. Farag and Elmasry were taken to a police station and jailed for four hours, during which time they were interrogated about suspected terrorist-surveillance activity aboard the plane. The agents found no evidence of criminal activity. Farag and Elmasry brought suit, based on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), against Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Special Agent William Ryan Plunkett and Detective Thomas Smith (defendants), two counterterrorism agents involved in the plaintiffs’ seizures and detentions, alleging that the seizure and subsequent imprisonment were unlawful. Plunkett and Smith moved for summary judgment on the basis of qualified immunity and also submitted a lengthy list of activities undertaken by Farag and Elmasry that the government argued supported a probable-cause determination, including the men’s seat changing, constant watch-checking, and speaking loudly in Arabic aboard the plane.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Block, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.