Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Farber v. Servan Land Company, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
662 F.2d 371 (1981)


Facts

Charles Serianni, A.I. Savin, and other investors formed Servan Land Company, Inc. (Servan) (defendant) to build a golf course. Serianni and Savin owned four-sevenths of Servan stock. Serianni was the president of Servan and the only active director. Servan purchased 160 acres on which to build the course. Subsequently, Servan purchased an additional 20 acres. At an annual stockholder meeting, a director stated that the seller was also willing to sell a 160-acre tract abutting the golf course, for use as an additional golf course. The stockholders discussed the opportunity at the meeting, but ultimately did not take a vote on the possible purchase. The following year, Serianni and Savin (defendants), the principal officers of Servan, purchased the additional 160 acres for themselves. Approximately four years later, Serianni, Savin, and Servan sold both 160-acre tracts. All stockholders except Jack Farber (plaintiff) approved the sale. Farber brought a shareholder derivative suit against Serianni, Savin, and Servan, claiming that the ability to purchase the additional 160-acre tract was a corporate opportunity, and that Serianni and Savin breached their fiduciary duty by purchasing the land individually. The district court ruled in favor of the defendants. The court made three findings: there was no corporate opportunity; even if there was, it was rejected by Servan; and the Servan stockholders ratified the additional purchase with their subsequent approval of the sale of both 160-acre tracts. Farber appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Tjoflat, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 176,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.