Farm Credit Bank v. FCB Ltd. Partnership
United States District Court for the District of Kansas
825 F. Supp. 932 (1993)
- Written by Jose Espejo , JD
Facts
In December 1986, Farm Credit Bank (Farm Credit) (plaintiff) and FCB Limited Partnership (FCB) (defendant) entered into an agreement whereby Farm Credit loaned funds to FCB to finance a purchase of real property. Pursuant to the agreement, Farm Credit as tenant obtained a leasehold estate in the real property from FCB as owner and landlord. In late 1987 and early 1988, Farm Credit and FCB negotiated with a third party, Omega Development Corporation and Omega Investments, Inc. (collectively, Omega) (defendant) for subleasing part of the real property. Omega allegedly represented FCB and acted as its agent throughout the negotiations. Farm Credit alleged that P. Tomas Mann (defendant), the president of Omega, represented Omega in the negotiations. On January 4, 1988, Mann wrote a letter to Farm Credit proposing terms of the sublease and amending the borrower-escrow-fund provision in the 1986 agreement. The letter provided Farm Credit with a space for execution and was signed on January 13, 1988. After executing the letter, Farm Credit learned that FCB had not authorized and would not recognize the agreement. On September 12, 1990, Farm Credit filed a diversity suit against FCB, later amending its complaint to include Mann and Omega for breach of implied warranty of authority to contract and to argue the discovery rule of accrual applied. Mann and Omega filed a motion for summary judgment against Farm Credit, arguing Farm Credit’s cause of action was a contract claim and barred by the three-year statute of limitations from the date Mann signed the letter agreement.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Belot, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.