Farmer Brothers Coffee v. Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board
California Court of Appeal
35 Cal. Rptr. 3d 23, 133 Cal. App. 4th 533 (2005)
- Written by Serena Lipski, JD
Facts
Rafael Ruiz (plaintiff) was injured while working for Farmer Brothers Coffee (Farmer Brothers) (defendant), and he filed a workers’-compensation claim. The California Labor Code defined an employee eligible to receive compensation as a person who is lawfully or unlawfully employed, including aliens. Farmer Brothers argued that Ruiz was not entitled to workers’-compensation benefits, because he was not legally authorized to work in the United States, alleging that Ruiz had provided a false Social Security card and green card to obtain employment and had used the false Social Security number on his workers’-compensation claim form. Farmer Brothers argued that the language in the statute regarding unlawfully employed applied only to situations in which the employer was guilty of illegally hiring a worker, not to situations in which the employee violated the law by using fraudulent documents, because an employee should not be able to benefit from illegally gaining employment. Farmer Brothers further argued that Ruiz’s use of a false Social Security card and green card violated the California Insurance Code, which criminalized knowingly false or fraudulent material representations made to obtain workers’-compensation benefits and barred a claimant convicted of doing so from receiving benefits. However, Ruiz had not been convicted. The Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board found that Ruiz was an employee for workers’-compensation purposes and allowed his claim. Farmer Brothers appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hastings, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 990 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.