Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Farwell v. Keaton

Supreme Court of Michigan
240 N.W.2d 217 (1976)


Facts

Siegrist (defendant) and Farwell drove to a parking lot to return a car, and then waited there for a friend. They saw two girls walk by the lot, and followed them down the street. When the girls complained to their friends, the friends chased Siegrist and Farwell, and severely beat Farwell. Siegrist found Farwell and applied an ice pack to his head. Siegrist then drove Farwell around for two hours, and Farwell fell asleep in the back of the car. Around midnight, Siegrist parked the car at Farwell’s grandparents’ house, tried unsuccessfully to wake Farwell, and then left, with Farwell still unconscious in the back of the car. Farwell was found the next morning and died of his injuries three days later. Farwell’s father (plaintiff) brought a wrongful death action, arguing that Siegrist knew that Farwell was badly injured, and that he would not have died if Siegrist had taken Farwell to the hospital or notified someone of his condition. The jury found for Farwell’s father, but the Court of Appeals reversed, holding that Siegrist did not have an affirmative duty to aid Farwell, and that Siegrist did not know that Farwell needed medical assistance.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Levin, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (Fitzgerald, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.