Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Fassihi v. Sommers, Schwartz, Silver, Schwartz and Tyler, P.C.

Michigan Court of Appeals
309 N.W.2d 645 (1981)


Facts

Dr. Fassihi, a radiologist, (plaintiff), was a 50 percent shareholder, officer, and board member in Livonia Physicians X-ray. P.C. (Livonia), a company formed with fellow physician Dr. Rudolfo Lopez who owned the other 50 percent. As a result of his involvement with Livonia, Fassihi obtained medical staff privileges at a nearby hospital. The hospital had an agreement with Livonia for the company to exclusively provide radiology services. After about 18 months of working with Fassihi, Dr. Lopez consulted with Livonia’s counsel, Sommers, Schwartz, Silver, Schwartz and Tyler, P.C. (Sommers) (defendant), regarding how Fassihi could be ousted from the company. Concurrently, Sommers represented Lopez personally in some legal matters. Donald Epstein, a Sommers attorney, notified Fassihi by letter that he had been terminated from Livonia. As a result, Fassihi lost his medical staff privileges at the hospital. Fassihi filed suit against Sommers for breach of attorney-client relationship, breach of fiduciary, legal, and ethical duties, fraud, and legal malpractice. The trial court denied Sommers’ motion for summary judgment and also denied Fassihi’s motion to compel discovery of information from Epstein and Sommers, which it refused to provide based on the attorney-client privilege. Each party filed an interlocutory appeal of the trial court’s order.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.