FC Investment Group LC v. IFX Markets, Ltd.

529 F.3d 1087 (2008)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

FC Investment Group LC v. IFX Markets, Ltd.

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
529 F.3d 1087 (2008)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD

Facts

FC Investment Group LC (FCIG) and Lawrence Eisenberg (plaintiffs) sued in federal court in the District of Columbia (D.C.) alleging that London-based currency broker IFX Markets Ltd. (IFX) (defendant) conspired with since-defunct investment company Titan Global Strategies Ltd. (Titan) to defraud FCIG and Eisenberg of millions of dollars in a currency-investment scheme. The complaint alleged fraud, civil conspiracy, civil aiding and abetting, and violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) in a scheme that IFX purportedly brokered and Titan ran. To support their claim that IFX and Titan agreed to commit fraud, the claimants alleged that a Titan director had testified in a related case that IFX and Titan were business partners, various emails and a fax between their employees confirmed a close working relationship, and employees from both companies worked together to create a PowerPoint presentation given to Eisenberg while he was visiting IFX’s London offices. The claimants alleged the presentation clearly indicated that Titan and IFX established a joint venture to engage in foreign-currency trading, displayed IFX’s logo, discussed Titan’s trading strategies, and named members of IFX’s “Investment Committee.” Finally, the claimants alleged Titan wired $100,000 to IFX and that afterward a Titan employee sent a Titan director a letter outlining further “potential revenue streams” for both companies. IFX moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. FCIG and Eisenberg responded that the district court had general personal jurisdiction over IFX based on IFX maintaining a website used in D.C., Titan’s actions within D.C. as IFX’s coconspirator, and a Titan employee regularly calling Eisenberg at his D.C. office, and pursuant to RICO’s nationwide-service-of-process provisions. The district court nonetheless dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction. FCIG and Eisenberg appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Henderson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 810,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership