Federal Communications Commission v. League of Women Voters of California
United States Supreme Court
468 U.S. 364 (1984)
- Written by Jamie Milne, JD
Facts
In 1967, Congress adopted the Public Broadcasting Act (the act) to promote noncommercial, educational broadcasting stations. The act created the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), a private, nonprofit organization governed by a bipartisan board of directors appointed by the president with the Senate’s consent. The act authorized the CPB to disburse federal funds to public radio and television broadcasting stations. There was concern that federal funding might be used to coerce stations into becoming propaganda machines for government interests. Consequently, in addition to creating the CPB as a private entity, rather than a government agency, the act also prohibited the CPB from owning any stations and imposed objective standards for fund disbursements. Further, the act prohibited any government agency or officer from exercising control over the CPB or any public radio or television broadcaster. As an additional measure, § 399 of the act prohibited public broadcasting stations receiving federal grants from engaging in editorializing, meaning that such stations could not present opinions on public issues, only facts. Pacifica Foundation (plaintiff), an organization owning multiple public broadcasting stations, sued the Federal Communications Commission (defendant), alleging that § 399 violated the First Amendment’s protection for free speech. The district held that the fear of government influence was not a sufficiently compelling government interest to justify the prohibition. The decision was appealed directly to the United States Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Brennan, J.)
Dissent (Stevens, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.