Federal Home Loan Bank Board v. Greater Delaware Valley Federal Savings and Loan Association
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
277 F.2d 437 (1960)
- Written by Robert Cane, JD
Facts
In 1938, Greater Delaware Valley Federal Savings and Loan Association (the association) (defendant) received a federal charter from the Federal Home Loan Bank Board (the board) (plaintiff). In 1958, the relationship between the board and the directors of the association became contentious. The board proposed to take over management of the association through a board representative. The board commenced administrative proceedings regarding the mismanagement of the association and the potential appointment of a conservator for the association. While the dispute between the board and the association was ongoing, the association’s directors approved a plan for the conversion of the association to a state-chartered institution. The association called a special meeting and held a vote regarding conversion, which was approved. Subsequently, the association filed articles of conversion, and Pennsylvania issued a formal certificate of conversion to the association. The formal conversion was completed while the board’s proceedings were still pending. Accordingly, the association began operating as a state-chartered institution and refused to recognize the authority of the board. The board sued the association, seeking a declaration that the association’s conversion to a state-chartered institution was legally ineffective. The board argued that conversion of the association required board approval. Officers of Pennsylvania intervened in the litigation in opposition to the board. The district court entered judgment for the association. The board appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hastie, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.