Federal Power Commission v. Florida Power & Light Co.

404 U.S. 453 (1972)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Federal Power Commission v. Florida Power & Light Co.

United States Supreme Court
404 U.S. 453 (1972)

  • Written by Robert Cane, JD

Facts

Florida Power & Light Company (FPL) (defendant) was an electric utility. FPL’s equipment and property were all located in Florida. FPL was interconnected with several other utilities within Florida including the Florida Power Corporation (Corp). FPL exported power to a bus (one or more conductors that collect and distribute electrical currents), which is the connection point between FPL and Corp. Power left the bus for out-of-state utilities at the same time FPL’s power entered the bus. The power was commingled from all sources. Corp interconnected with Georgia Power Company, an out-of-state utility. Also, as a member of the Florida Pool, FPL was a member of the Interconnected Systems Group (ISG). The ISG was a national group of utilities that shared power in the event of an emergency. On at least one occasion, FPL contributed to the ISG during an event in which an out-of-state utility drew power from the ISG system. Section 201(b) of the Federal Power Act provided that the Federal Power Commission (the commission) (plaintiff) had jurisdiction over energy transmitted in interstate commerce. Energy transmitted in interstate commerce is energy that is transmitted within a state and consumed outside of the state. In a hearing, the commission determined that FPL was subject to the commission’s jurisdiction because the energy that FPL generated was transmitted in interstate commerce. The court of appeals rejected the commission’s determination. The commission appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (White, J.)

Dissent (Douglas, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 810,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership