From our private database of 28,700+ case briefs...
Federal Trade Commission and State of Illinois v. Advocate Health Care Network, et al.
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
841 F.3d 460 (2016)
In 2004, Advocate Health Care Network (Advocate) and NorthShore University HealthSystem (NorthShore) (defendants), two northern Chicago hospital networks, announced plans to merge. In response, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the State of Illinois (government) (plaintiffs) filed suit against Advocate and NorthShore. The complaint alleged that the merger would lessen competition in the relevant market in violation of § 7 of the Clayton Act. The government then moved for a preliminary injunction. The district court held a hearing to determine whether the motion should be granted. During the hearing, the FTC’s economic expert, Dr. Tenn, testified that he had used the hypothetical-monopolist test to determine the relevant geographic market. Dr. Tenn also testified that his analysis assumed that patients prefer local hospitals and that he had excluded from the geographic market hospitals that attract patients at long distances, i.e., destination hospitals. Multiple insurers testified that an insurance plan in the area must include either Advocate or NorthShore. The district court found that Dr. Tenn’s analysis was circular and that there was no basis for treating destination and local hospitals differently. The district court therefore denied the injunction on the ground that the government had not shown a likelihood of success on the merits. The matter was appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Hamilton, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 546,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 546,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 28,700 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.