Federal Trade Commission v. Airborne Health, Inc.
United States District Court for the Central District of California
CV08-05300 (2008)
- Written by Sheri Dennis, JD
Facts
Airborne Health, Inc. (Airborne) (defendant) was the manufacturer of certain dietary-supplement products. Airborne advertised that its products could provide health benefits and prevent or reduce cold symptoms. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) (plaintiff) sued Airborne, alleging that Airborne had violated provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act (FTCA), 15 U.S.C. §§ 45(a) and 52, by falsely advertising its products’ capabilities based on unreliable scientific evidence and misinterpretations of tests and studies. Airborne did not admit or deny liability. Rather, the parties agreed to a permanent injunction and settlement of all claims and presented the district court with a stipulated final judgment and order.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 966,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,007 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New
Understand your casebook readings in seconds
Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.
Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,007 law school casebooks.

