Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Federal Trade Commission v. Bay Area Business Council

United Sates Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
423 F.3d 627 (2005)


Facts

Bay Area Business Council, Inc. (BABC) (defendant) contracted with a telemarketing company to have telemarketers call consumers who had recently applied but been denied for a credit card. Telemarketers read from a prepared script and told consumers that their records indicated the consumers had recently applied for a credit card and were now eligible to receive a MasterCard. Additionally, telemarketers told consumers that having a MasterCard would be good for their credit ratings. Telemarketers concluded by informing consumers that they would be charged a one-time processing fee to receive a MasterCard. In order to pay the fee, consumers provided telemarketers with their bank-account information. Telemarketers then played an automated disclosure that ended by asking consumers to acknowledge that they agreed with what had been discussed. Within days of the call, BABC debited funds from consumers’ accounts in excess of the agreed-upon processing fee. Soon after, consumers received a card from BABC containing the MasterCard logo. However, the card sent by BABC was not a credit card, but a stored-value card that could only be used by consumers if they preloaded their own funds onto it. Additionally, a $15 activation fee was required prior to using the card. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) (plaintiff) sued BABC for deceptive trade practices in violation of section 5(a) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (FTCA), 15 U.S.C. § 45(a), and the Telemarketing Sales Rule (TSR), 16 C.F.R. §§ 310.1-.9. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the FTC, and BABC appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Rovner, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.