Federal Trade Commission v. CCC Holdings Inc.

605 F.Supp.2d 26 (D.D.C. 2009).

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Federal Trade Commission v. CCC Holdings Inc.

United States District Court for the District of Columbia
605 F.Supp.2d 26 (D.D.C. 2009).

Facts

CCC Information Services (CCC) (defendant), Mitchell International, Inc. (Mitchell) (defendant), and Audatex North America, Inc. (Audatex) were the three major US producers of estimatics software and total-loss-valuation software systems (TLV). All major automobile insurers and most automotive-repair shops subscribed to estimatics software, relying on it to estimate the cost of vehicle repairs. Most insurers also subscribed to TLV to determine the value of replacement vehicles for vehicles that were total losses. Together, CCC, Mitchell, and Audatex accounted for 99 percent of the estimatics-software market and over 90 percent of the TLV market. CCC and Mitchell attempted a merger of equals, meaning a merger of two companies with roughly equal financial strength into one company with combined management. If the merger took place, the combined CCC-Mitchell entity would hold about 70 percent of the estimatics market and 65 percent of the TLV market. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) (plaintiff) sued CCC and Mitchell, seeking a preliminary injunction preventing the merger. The FTC argued that reducing the number of market competitors from three to two would obviously and substantially harm market competition. CCC and Mitchell countered that market realities reduced the likelihood of anticompetitive effects. The district court considered the parties’ arguments.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Collyer, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership