Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Federal Trade Commission v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.

United States Supreme Court
380 U.S. 374 (1965)


Facts

Colgate-Palmolive Co. (Colgate) (defendant) sold a shaving cream called Rapid Shave. Colgate advertised Rapid Shave as possessing powerful moisturizing abilities. To drive the point home, Colgate staged a “sandpaper test” to be used in commercials. The sandpaper test showed Rapid Shave being applied to sandpaper. The sandpaper was immediately shaved clean, demonstrating Rapid Shave’s moisturizing ability. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) (plaintiff) filed a complaint, arguing that the Rapid Shave commercials were deceptive within the meaning of § 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (FTC Act). The FTC presented evidence that a piece of sandpaper would need to be soaked in Rapid Shave for 80 minutes before the sandpaper could be shaved clean. The commercials also used fake sandpaper made from plexiglass and sand. The hearing examiner dismissed the FTC’s complaint, but the commission reversed that decision and entered a cease and desist order against Colgate. The order prohibited Colgate from using undisclosed simulations in commercials. Colgate appealed the order to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, which held that the FTC’s enforcement order was too vague. The FTC petitioned for a writ of certiorari in the United States Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Warren, C. J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.