Federal Trade Commission v. Grolier, Inc.
United States Supreme Court
462 U.S. 19 (1983)
- Written by Heather Whittemore, JD
Facts
In 1972 the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) (defendant) opened an investigation into a subsidiary of Grolier, Inc. (plaintiff) in connection with a lawsuit filed against Grolier by the United States Department of Justice. In 1976 the lawsuit was dismissed. In 1978 Grolier filed a request with the FTC pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) for internal documents related to the investigation. FOIA required the government to make its records publicly available. The FTC refused to disclose the documents, citing the attorney-work-product exemption to FOIA codified at 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(5). This exemption, which incorporated the attorney-work-product doctrine, covered internal agency records that would not be available to a party engaged in litigation against the FTC. Grolier filed a lawsuit against the FTC in federal district court, arguing that the attorney-work-product exemption did not apply to the documents, because the Department of Justice’s lawsuit against Grolier had been dismissed. The district court held that the documents were exempt from disclosure under the attorney-work-product exemption. On appeal, the court of appeals held that the documents could not be exempt under the attorney-work-product exemption unless the FTC could show that litigation related to the documents actively or potentially existed. The FTC appealed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (White, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.