Federal Trade Commission v. Peabody Energy Corp.

492 F. Supp. 3d 865 (2020)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Federal Trade Commission v. Peabody Energy Corp.

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
492 F. Supp. 3d 865 (2020)

SC

Facts

Peabody Energy Company (Peabody) and Arch Resources, Inc. (Arch) (defendants) were the two largest coal producers in the United States. Coal supplied 20 percent of electricity in the United States but was losing its electricity-market share due to decreasing gas prices, increasing use of renewable energies such as wind and solar, and decreasing coal production. Nevertheless, coal was projected to continue to be an important part of the country’s electricity for decades. To help mitigate the decline in market share, Peabody and Arch agreed to a joint venture in which they would combine some of their coal operations. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) (plaintiff) filed suit to block the joint venture, at least temporarily, until it could conduct a full hearing to determine whether the joint venture violated antitrust laws. To that end, the FTC moved for a preliminary injunction. The FTC presented evidence that although there was competition between coal and other energy sources, certain coal customers valued coal because of its unique characteristics. For example, coal could be stockpiled, but gas and renewable energies could not. In addition, certain customers owned established, expensive plants that were configured to produce energy using coal. The FTC produced evidence that the combined entity in the joint venture would account for 65–70 percent of coal produced in the Southern Powder River Basin (SPRB).

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Pitlyk, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 833,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 833,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 833,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership