Fedorenko v. United States

449 U.S. 490 (1981)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Fedorenko v. United States

United States Supreme Court
449 U.S. 490 (1981)

Facts

Fedorenko (defendant) was a soldier in the Russian army during World War II who was captured by German forces. After being initially placed in prisoner-of-war camps, Fedorenko was eventually trained and assigned to be a paid, armed guard at Treblinka, an infamous concentration camp in Poland where hundreds of thousands of Jewish civilians were killed. After Treblinka was closed by the Nazis, Fedorenko was transferred to work as a guard at other facilities. When Allied forces closed in on Germany, Fedorenko managed to leave his post and pass as a civilian. In 1949, Fedorenko applied for admission to the United States (plaintiff) under a program that allowed European displaced persons to immigrate to the United States. The program specifically excluded any individuals who had assisted the enemy in persecuting civilians. Fedorenko lied about his wartime activities on his visa application, claiming that he had been a farmer in Poland who had been deported to Germany and forced to work in a factory. He was granted a visa, immigrated to the United States, worked in a factory for years, and eventually applied for naturalized citizenship in 1969. Fedorenko again concealed his wartime activities during the citizenship-application process and was granted citizenship in 1970. In 1977, the United States became aware that Fedorenko had been an armed guard at Treblinka and that he had willfully concealed this fact during his initial application for a displaced-persons visa and during the naturalization process. The United States brought a denaturalization action to strip Fedorenko of his citizenship, alleging that he had obtained his citizenship illegally. The district court held for Fedorenko, but the court of appeals reversed the decision and entered a judgment of denaturalization. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Marshall, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 802,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership