Feiner v. SS & C Technologies, Inc.
United States District Court for the District of Connecticut
47 F.Supp. 2d 250 (1999)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
SS&C Technologies, Inc. (SS&C) (defendant) sold securities through an IPO underwritten by Alex. Brown & Sons Inc. (Brown) (defendant) and Hambrecht & Quist LLC (Hambrecht) (defendant). SS&C sold all shares to Brown and Hambrecht, and Brown and Hambrecht then sold all of those shares to the public. Feiner (plaintiff) filed a putative class action suit against SS&C based on § 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933. Some members of the class had purchased their shares directly from the initial distribution from the IPO. Other class members had purchased their shares from Brown and Hambrecht after Brown and Hambrecht had reacquired the shares on the aftermarket, but within 25 days of the IPO, when federal regulations required delivery of a prospectus to purchasers. Finally, some class members purchased their shares on the aftermarket from third parties. SS&C argued that the class should not be certified because some class members did not purchase their shares directly from the IPO.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hall, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.