Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Felder v. Reeth

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
34 F.2d 744 (1929)


Facts

Felder and others (plaintiffs) sued in district court in the then-territory of Alaska to recover $5,402.65 for goods, wares, and merchandise sold to Reeth (defendant) and for Reeth’s checks cashed by the plaintiffs. Reeth admitted to the money obligation but counterclaimed for the conversion and sale of his mining equipment and machinery. In his counterclaim, Reeth waived the tort involved in the conversion. Instead, Reeth relied upon an implied contract created by law, whereby the plaintiffs owed him the reasonable value of the machinery and equipment. Reeth argued that the reasonable value of the equipment was $10,000. The plaintiffs admitted to taking the mining equipment and alleged that the equipment had been taken to save it from total destruction by the flooding of the river banks on which the equipment had been placed. The plaintiffs further stated that they had sold the equipment for $550, which was its reasonable value in the region. The district court held that Reeth owed the plaintiffs $8,690.21 and that the plaintiffs owed Reeth $12,480 including interest, and rendered judgment in Reeth’s favor for the difference. The district court found that the reasonable value of the mining equipment at the time and place of the taking was $8,000 based on the use that Reeth could put the equipment to, despite the fact that the equipment had no market value. The plaintiffs appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Wilbur, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 218,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.