Feldman v. Google, Inc.
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
513 F.Supp.2d 229 (2007)
- Written by Craig Conway, LLM
Facts
Lawrence Feldman (plaintiff), an attorney, purchased advertising through Google, Inc.’s (defendant) “AdWords” program in an attempt to attract new clients. Under the program, if an internet user searched using key words purchased by Feldman his law firm ad would appear at the top of the webpage. Once an internet searcher clicked on Feldman’s ad, Google charged him. This type of advertising is called “pay per click” advertising. Feldman claimed that competitors or pranksters intentionally clicked on his ad to drive up the cost of his advertising which exceeded $100,000 over a three-year period. Nevertheless, Google required Feldman to pay for the “clicks.” Feldman filed suit against Google for damages, disgorgement of any profits Google obtained as a result of any unlawful conduct, and restitution of money Feldman paid for fraudulent clicks. Google filed a motion to dismiss Feldman’s complaint, or in the alternative, to transfer the case to California. Feldman filed a cross-motion for summary judgment. The court ruled on both motions.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Giles, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.