Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Fernandez v. California

134 S. Ct. 1126 (2014)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 35,600+ case briefs...

Fernandez v. California

United States Supreme Court

134 S. Ct. 1126 (2014)

Play video

Facts

Police officers were investigating an assault and robbery involving gang activity. The officers were directed to a nearby building, where they observed a man run inside. The officers heard screams and the sounds of a fight coming from inside. The officers knocked on the door of the apartment, and Roxanne Rojas answered. She was clearly hurt and stated that she had been in a fight. When the officers asked Rojas to step outside so they could conduct a sweep of the apartment, Walter Fernandez (defendant) appeared at the door and told the officers they did not have a right to enter the apartment. Rojas identified Fernandez as her attacker, and the police arrested him. Approximately an hour later, officers returned to the apartment and told Rojas that they had arrested Fernandez and that he was in jail. The officers asked for consent to search the apartment, and Rojas agreed. The police discovered gang paraphernalia, a butterfly knife, clothing worn by the robbery suspect, and a sawed-off shotgun. The State of California (plaintiff) charged Fernandez with several crimes, including robbery. Fernandez moved to suppress the evidence discovered in the apartment, arguing that his earlier objection to the search meant Rojas’s consent was not effective.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Alito, J.)

Concurrence (Thomas, J.)

Concurrence (Scalia, J.)

Dissent (Ginsburg, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 618,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 618,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 618,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 35,600 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership