Fernwood Mobile Home Park v. Almeyda
California Court of Appeal
2002 WL 31862850 (2002)
- Written by Sharon Feldman, JD
Facts
Fernwood Mobile Home Park (Fernwood) (plaintiff) was a mobile-home development in California established in 1970 as an adults-only community. In 1989, federal law required that the park be opened to families with children. Fernwood adopted rules prohibiting virtually all of children’s typical outdoor play activities. Angelina Almeyda purchased a mobile home in Fernwood for herself, her husband, and their three children. Almeyda and her husband (the Almeydas) (defendants) signed Fernwood’s rules and regulations despite the Fernwood manager’s warning that the children would not like living there. Conflict and litigation based on alleged violation of the rules and regulations ensued. Fernwood sued the Almeydas for breach of contract and abatement of nuisance, and the Almeydas cross-complained on theories of negligence and unlawful discrimination against families with children. While ruling on post-trial motions, the judge compared Fernwood to Nazi camps, referred to the owners as “park Nazis,” and commented about how offended he was by the partners’ testimony that they had no idea about the discriminatory practices, likening their testimony to people in Germany saying, “What oven? What Jewish problem? What camps? We smell nothing. This is dust settling on us.” The Almeydas obtained a permanent injunction prohibiting Fernwood from engaging in unlawful discrimination against families with children. Fernwood appealed, arguing in part that judicial bias required reversal of the judgment and remand to a different judge for a new trial.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (O’Leary, J.)
Dissent (Fybel, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.