Ferrara v. Galluchio
New York Court of Appeals
5 N.Y.2d 16, 176 N.Y.S.2d 996, 152 N.E.2d 249 (1958)

- Written by Darius Dehghan, JD
Facts
Eleanor Ferrara (plaintiff) had bursitis in her right shoulder and received a series of X-ray treatments from Dr. Anthony Galluchio (defendant). After the treatments, Ferrara developed a radiation burn on her shoulder. Later, Ferrara was examined by a dermatologist. The dermatologist told Ferrara that Ferrara should have her shoulder checked every six months because cancer might develop. Ferrara brought suit against Galluchio, alleging that she suffered from mental anxiety as a result of the treatments. Specifically, Ferrara’s mental anxiety arose from the fear that Ferrara would develop cancer at the site of the radiation burn. At the trial, Ferrara sought to introduce the dermatologist’s out-of-court statement into evidence. The statement was not offered for the purpose of proving that Ferrara might develop cancer. Rather, the statement was offered for the purpose of establishing that there was a basis for Ferrara’s mental anxiety. The trial-court judge admitted the dermatologist’s statement into evidence. Subsequently, the jury ruled in favor of Ferrara. The appellate division affirmed. Galluchio appealed to the New York Court of Appeals.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Conway, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.