Ferrara v. Galluchio

5 N.Y.2d 16, 176 N.Y.S.2d 996, 152 N.E.2d 249 (1958)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Ferrara v. Galluchio

New York Court of Appeals
5 N.Y.2d 16, 176 N.Y.S.2d 996, 152 N.E.2d 249 (1958)

Facts

Eleanor Ferrara (plaintiff) had bursitis in her right shoulder and received a series of X-ray treatments from Dr. Anthony Galluchio (defendant). After the treatments, Ferrara developed a radiation burn on her shoulder. Later, Ferrara was examined by a dermatologist. The dermatologist told Ferrara that Ferrara should have her shoulder checked every six months because cancer might develop. Ferrara brought suit against Galluchio, alleging that she suffered from mental anxiety as a result of the treatments. Specifically, Ferrara’s mental anxiety arose from the fear that Ferrara would develop cancer at the site of the radiation burn. At the trial, Ferrara sought to introduce the dermatologist’s out-of-court statement into evidence. The statement was not offered for the purpose of proving that Ferrara might develop cancer. Rather, the statement was offered for the purpose of establishing that there was a basis for Ferrara’s mental anxiety. The trial-court judge admitted the dermatologist’s statement into evidence. Subsequently, the jury ruled in favor of Ferrara. The appellate division affirmed. Galluchio appealed to the New York Court of Appeals.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Conway, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership