Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. Smith

356 U.S. 274 (1958)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. Smith

United States Supreme Court
356 U.S. 274 (1958)

Facts

Mary Haines purchased three policies in single transactions, each combining a life-insurance policy (payable to her children) with a life-annuity policy (payable to Haines). The policies provided that, in the event of Haines’s premature death, the prepaid annuity premiums would combine with the prepaid insurance premiums to equal the insurance proceeds to be paid. Each of the annuity policies could have been purchased separately from the insurance policies for the same amounts. Haines assigned all right, title, and interest in the policies to Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Company (plaintiff). After Haines’s death, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) determined that the annuity proceeds should be included in Haines’s gross estate as retained income, relying on Internal Revenue Code (IRC) § 811, which applies to retained interests in estate property. [Editor’s Note: This provision is now IRC § 2036.] Fidelity-Philadelphia brought suit in federal district court, which found in favor of the taxpayers. IRS collector Francis Smith (defendant) appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, which reversed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Warren, C.J.)

Dissent (Burton, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership