Field v. Haddonfield Board of Education
United States District Court for the District of New Jersey
769 F. Supp. 1313 (1991)

- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
Daniel was a high-school student who had developmental and emotional disabilities and behavioral problems at school. The Haddonfield Board of Education (the district) (defendant) agreed with Daniel’s parents, the Fields (plaintiffs) to place Daniel at a private school for emotionally disturbed children at the district’s expense. Daniel was expelled from that school, however, for bringing illegal drugs into the school. The school allowed Daniel to return on the condition that Daniel attend a residential substance-abuse program. The Fields requested that the district pay for Daniel’s placement in the substance-abuse program, but the district refused, holding that the program was a medical expense and not a necessary related service under the Education for All Handicapped Children Act (EAHCA). The Fields filed a petition in federal district court seeking a determination that the district was responsible for the costs of the substance-abuse program.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gerry, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.