Fifty-Six Hope Road Music Ltd. v. UMG Recordings, Inc.

2010 WL 3564258 (2010)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Fifty-Six Hope Road Music Ltd. v. UMG Recordings, Inc.

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
2010 WL 3564258 (2010)

SH

Facts

In 1972, Bob Marley entered into a recording agreement with Island Records, Ltd. (Island) pursuant to which Marley agreed to perform services as a recording artist for Island and to the produce sufficient acceptable recordings for two albums. Island agreed to pay Marley certain advances against royalties for the creation of the sound recordings. Island and Marley were to “[m]utually agree” as to the lyrics and music to be recorded, but Island had the right to “[d]ecide in its discretion whether or not such lyrics and music as recorded as acceptable and satisfactory for the manufacture and sale of records.” Marley entered into new recording agreements with Island in 1974 and 1975 with terms similar to the 1972 agreement. Following Marley’s death in 1981, Marley’s widow and nine children (Marleys) (plaintiffs) sued UMG (defendant) as predecessor-in-interest to Island, seeking a declaratory judgment that the Marleys owned the renewal terms in the copyrights in the sound records created pursuant to the 1972, 1974, and 1975 agreements.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Cote, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership