FilmTec Corp. v. Allied Signal Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
939 F.2d 1568, 19 U.S.P.Q.2d 1508 (1991)
- Written by Eric Miller, JD
Facts
John Cadotte was employed at a division of the Midwest Research Institute (MRI), which performed research for the United States government. The contract between MRI and the government included a provision stating that all inventions created by MRI employees within the scope of their employment would become the property of the government. Cadotte secured a patent on one of the inventions that he had made during his employment with MRI. Cadotte assigned the patent to FilmTec Corporation (plaintiff), a company that he had cofounded with three other MRI employees. FilmTec brought suit against Allied-Signal Inc. (defendant) and UOP Inc. (defendant) (collectively, Allied) for infringement of the patent. The federal district court found that the government did not gain title to the invention—or, at most, held equitable title—and that Cadotte’s assignment of the patent to FilmTec was a valid transfer of title. However, evidence pertaining to ownership of title in the patent was not discussed at trial. The court issued a preliminary injunction against Allied. Allied appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Plager, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.