Fina Oil & Chemical Co. v. Norton
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
332 F.3d 672 (2003)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Fina Oil & Chemical Co. (Fina) (plaintiff) was a lessee of federal land. Fina Natural Gas Company (FNGC) was a gas reseller controlled by Fina. FNGC was not a marketing affiliate of Fina, however, because it also bought gas from other, non-affiliated entities. When Fina sold gas to FNGC, it paid royalties based on its sale price to FNGC. The Secretary of the U.S. Department of Interior (DOI) (defendant), however, ruled that gas sold by Fina to FNGC should be valued on the basis of FNGC’s resale price. The pertinent DOI regulation stated that gas sold by a lessee of federal land to a non-marketing affiliate was valued on the basis of “gross proceeds accruing to the lessee pursuant to a sale under its non-arm’s length contract . . . provided that those gross proceeds are equivalent to the gross proceeds derived from [comparable sales in the same field or area]”. The DOI found the term “lessee” to include all affiliates of Fina, including FNGC. Thus, according to the DOI, Fina was required to calculate royalties based on the gross proceeds accruing to FNGC after the resale. The relevant statute defined “lessee” as “any person to whom the United States . . . issues a lease.” Fina brought suit, challenging the DOI’s interpretation of its regulation. The district court affirmed the DOI’s interpretation. Fina appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Tatel, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.