Fina Oil & Chemical Co. v. Norton

332 F.3d 672 (2003)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Fina Oil & Chemical Co. v. Norton

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
332 F.3d 672 (2003)

SC

Facts

Fina Oil & Chemical Co. (Fina) (plaintiff) was a lessee of federal land. Fina Natural Gas Company (FNGC) was a gas reseller controlled by Fina. FNGC was not a marketing affiliate of Fina, however, because it also bought gas from other, non-affiliated entities. When Fina sold gas to FNGC, it paid royalties based on its sale price to FNGC. The Secretary of the U.S. Department of Interior (DOI) (defendant), however, ruled that gas sold by Fina to FNGC should be valued on the basis of FNGC’s resale price. The pertinent DOI regulation stated that gas sold by a lessee of federal land to a non-marketing affiliate was valued on the basis of “gross proceeds accruing to the lessee pursuant to a sale under its non-arm’s length contract . . . provided that those gross proceeds are equivalent to the gross proceeds derived from [comparable sales in the same field or area]”. The DOI found the term “lessee” to include all affiliates of Fina, including FNGC. Thus, according to the DOI, Fina was required to calculate royalties based on the gross proceeds accruing to FNGC after the resale. The relevant statute defined “lessee” as “any person to whom the United States . . . issues a lease.” Fina brought suit, challenging the DOI’s interpretation of its regulation. The district court affirmed the DOI’s interpretation. Fina appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Tatel, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership