Finch v. Weiner
Connecticut Supreme Court
145 A. 31 (1929)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Lewis Finch (plaintiff) was injured in a car accident allegedly caused by Skinner, who was an employee of Phillip Weiner (defendant). Finch sued Weiner to recover for his injuries. At trial, Finch called Skinner as a witness. On direct examination, Finch asked Skinner only to confirm that he was employed by Weiner and to identify an accident report Skinner had filed. On cross-examination, over Finch’s objection, Weiner asked Skinner to recount the details of the accident, including events before and after. The testimony was prejudicial to Finch. The jury returned a verdict in Weiner’s favor. Finch appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hinman, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 787,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.