Finch v. Weiner
Connecticut Supreme Court
145 A. 31 (1929)

- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Lewis Finch (plaintiff) was injured in a car accident allegedly caused by Skinner, who was an employee of Phillip Weiner (defendant). Finch sued Weiner to recover for his injuries. At trial, Finch called Skinner as a witness. On direct examination, Finch asked Skinner only to confirm that he was employed by Weiner and to identify an accident report Skinner had filed. On cross-examination, over Finch’s objection, Weiner asked Skinner to recount the details of the accident, including events before and after. The testimony was prejudicial to Finch. The jury returned a verdict in Weiner’s favor. Finch appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hinman, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 966,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,007 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New
Understand your casebook readings in seconds
Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.
Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,007 law school casebooks.

