First American Commerce Co. v. Washington Mutual Savings Bank
Supreme Court of Utah
743 P.2d 1193 (1987)
- Written by Denise McGimsey, JD
Facts
First American Commerce Co. (First American) (plaintiff) obtained a loan from First Security Realty Services (First Security) (defendant) secured by a commercial building owned by First American. The loan agreement gave First Security the right to approve new leases in the building and, in addition, provided that a percentage of the loan amount would be retained until First American had completed certain tenant improvements. On the day that the loan documents were executed, First Security assigned the loan to Washington Mutual Savings Bank (WAMU) (defendant) with the knowledge and consent of First American. When an opportunity to lease space in the building arose, First American requested approval from both First Security and WAMU. Neither approved. Later, First American completed the required improvements and requested that First Security release the loan funds being held back. First Security responded that it need not release the funds because it had delegated that obligation to WAMU. First American brought suit against both First Security and WAMU. The trial court awarded summary judgment to defendants with the exception of one claim for fraud against First Security. First American appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Durham, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.