First Federal Bank v. Weinstein (In re Weinstein)

227 B.R. 284 (1998)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

First Federal Bank v. Weinstein (In re Weinstein)

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Ninth Circuit
227 B.R. 284 (1998)

Facts

First Federal Bank of California (the bank) (plaintiff) made a loan to Norton and Joyce Weinstein (defendants) of approximately $1 million with 10 percent annual interest. The loan was secured by a deed of trust on the Weinsteins’ residence. The Weinsteins later filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. The bank sought adequate protection against the depreciation of the residence, which was valued at $850,000 at the time of the Weinsteins’ filing. The court ordered the Weinsteins to make monthly adequate-protection payments of $7,000. The Weinsteins paid a total of $98,000 in this manner. When the reorganization plan was confirmed, the property’s value was unchanged. The court credited the $98,000 against the $850,000 secured by the Weinsteins’ residence, reducing the bank’s secured claim to $752,000. The bank appealed, contending that the $98,000 should have been credited against the unsecured portion of its claim. The United States Bankruptcy Court Appellate Panel of the Ninth Circuit granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Russell, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 833,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 833,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 833,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership