First Financial Bank, N.A., v. GE Commercial Distribution Finance Corp.

2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54674, 77 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d 416 (2012)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

First Financial Bank, N.A., v. GE Commercial Distribution Finance Corp.

United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54674, 77 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d 416 (2012)

Facts

First Financial Bank, N.A. (First Bank) (plaintiff) loaned money to Lakota Watersports, Inc. (Lakota) and perfected a security interest in nearly all Lakota’s assets on February 2, 2005. Subsequently, Lakota borrowed money from GE Commercial Distribution Finance Corp. (GE) (defendant) to purchase more inventory. Prior to executing the financing agreement with Lakota, GE sent a notification of its purchase-money security interest (PMSI) in inventory to Lakota’s existing creditors, including First Bank, as required by Ohio law. Then GE and Lakota executed an agreement in which GE provided additional funds for Lakota’s acquisition of inventory in exchange for certain collateral. GE filed a financing statement on November 30, 2006. Lakota increased its inventory with the additional funds, including the purchase of three boats. However, Lakota eventually defaulted on its loans with GE and First Bank. On August 27, 2010, Lakota gave GE possession of the three boats. When GE notified Lakota’s existing creditors that it would liquidate the three boats, First Bank demanded that GE turn over the proceeds from the sale. GE refused, and First Bank filed suit seeking either the boats or the proceeds from the sale. First Bank asserted that its security interest was entitled to priority, claiming that GE’s PMSI notification was not properly authenticated because the notice was not signed. However, Ohio law did not require authentication by signature. The notice (1) was on GE letterhead, (2) with GE’s name and address, (3) described the collateral as new and used boats and various other types of marine products, and (4) was sent by certified mail with return receipt requested. First Bank also claimed GE’s description of the collateral was insufficient. First Bank and GE both sought summary judgment.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Weber, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership