From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...
First Interstate Bancorp v. Stenquist
United States District Court for the Northern District of California
16 U.S.P.Q.2d 1704 (1990)
First Interstate Bancorp (Bancorp) (plaintiff) owned a number of banks called “First Interstate Banks.” Bancorp registered “First Interstate Banks” in California in 1980 and then with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) between 1984 and 1986. Stenquist (defendant) owned a real-estate business called “First Interstate Realty.” Stenquist claimed that this title was used since 1981 and without any knowledge that Bancorp had used “First Interstate.” In 1988, Stenquist licensed the use of “First Interstate Realty” to Carson. The license was labeled as a limited license to use the trademark, but Stenquist did not enforce or control Carson’s use of it after the agreement had been signed. The agreement did not contain any other quality-control requirements except that Carson warrant that he was a broker in good standing. The agreement also emphasized that the two companies would remain separate entities. Bancorp sued Stenquist for trademark infringement, and Stenquist counterclaimed that Bancorp had committed trademark infringement. Bancorp claimed that it had used and registered “First Interstate” prior to Stenquist’s use of it. Furthermore, Bancorp claimed that, even if Stenquist had a right to use the mark, the license of the mark to Carson waived Stenquist’s right to bring a claim for trademark infringement. Bancorp filed for a partial summary judgment on whether Stenquist had abandoned his rights to the trademark.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Patel, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.