First National Bank of Atlanta v. United States

634 F.2d 212 (1981)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

First National Bank of Atlanta v. United States

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
634 F.2d 212 (1981)

JC

Facts

Daniel McWhorter died in 1972. His will included several bequests and provided for the residue of his estate to be divided between a family trust and a marital trust. The will provided for dividing the residue evenly into the pools for the two trusts and provided for the marital-trust pool to include all property subject to a marital deduction. The will also stated that all estate taxes were to be paid from the residue of McWhorter’s estate. Ultimately, First National Bank of Atlanta (the bank) (plaintiff), the executor of the estate, filed an estate-tax return that calculated the marital deduction at one-half of the residue of the estate before the payment of estate taxes. The government (defendant) found that the deduction should have been one-half of the residue of the estate after the payment of estate taxes. The government issued a notice of deficiency for the difference, and the bank paid that tax, then sued for a refund. As a general rule, estate taxes were assessed before a spousal bequest, however, the court considered the specific terms of the will and whether it had prescribed a different mechanism for paying the funds in question.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership