First National Bank of Chicago v. King

651 N.E.2d 127 (1995)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

First National Bank of Chicago v. King

Illinois Supreme Court
651 N.E.2d 127 (1995)

SC

Facts

Louis Swift’s will established a trust, with the proceeds to be paid to his daughter-in-law, Lydia Niblack Swift (Niblack), the widow of Louis’s deceased son Alden Swift. The will stated that if Niblack died prior to the trust’s termination, the proceeds should go to the “lawful descendants” of Alden and Niblack in equal shares per stirpes. Alden and Niblack had three children, Lydia, Nathan, and Narcissa. Nathan predeceased Niblack, leaving a biological son, Nathan Jr., and an adopted daughter, Martha (defendant). After Niblack’s death, trust proceeds were paid to Lydia, Narcissa, and Nathan Jr. Martha requested that the trustee, First National Bank of Chicago (trustee) (plaintiff), pay her as a beneficiary to the trust. The trustee refused to pay any of the corpus to Martha, deciding that because she was adopted, she did not qualify as a lawful descendant of Alden and Niblack. The trustee brought suit for a declaratory judgment on that issue. The circuit court found in favor of the trustee. The appellate court reversed. The trustee appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Harrison, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership