From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...
First National Bank of Omaha v. Three Dimension Systems Products, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
289 F.3d 542 (2002)
The First National Bank of Omaha (Bank) (plaintiff) entered into a contract with Three Dimension Systems Products, Inc. (3D) (defendant), under which 3D was to create a computer software program for the Bank. After 3D delivered Stage I of the program to the Bank, 3D sent the Bank an invoice for an additional $250,000. 3D also informed the Bank that 3D would not be fixing any errors in Stage I after delivery. The Bank sued 3D for anticipatory breach, arguing that 3D had anticipatorily breached by refusing to make sure that Stage I would function correctly and by demanding the $250,000. 3D counterclaimed for breach of contract, and defended itself on the basis that the Bank had not given 3D an opportunity to cure the alleged breach. The Bank’s evidence included documents from 3D concerning the 10-day fixing period and the $250,000 invoice. The Bank also introduced testimony that 3D’s president had orally indicated that any Stage I errors would not be fixed until Stage III or IV, if at all, and that 3D would not move on to the next stage of development unless and until the invoice had been paid. The Bank’s evidence also suggested that the contract did not authorize the invoice. 3D argued that it would have fixed any errors in the later stages of the project and that its continued performance was not conditioned on the Bank’s payment of the invoice. A jury ruled in favor of the Bank, finding that 3D had anticipatorily breached the contract. However, the district court granted 3D’s motion for judgment as a matter of law. The Bank appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Kyle, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 217,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.