First National Exchange Bank of Roanoke v. United States

335 F.2d 91 (1964)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

First National Exchange Bank of Roanoke v. United States

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
335 F.2d 91 (1964)

Facts

When Josephus Pell died, his will left his widow, Frances Pell, a life estate in all his property. Under Virginia law, Frances had the option of renouncing, i.e., disclaiming, her inheritance under the will and claiming a dower right instead. Ideally, this dower right would give Frances a full ownership interest in one-half of Josephus’s personal property and a life estate in one-third of his real property. However, if it was not possible to give Frances the dower interests in those exact forms, Frances was entitled to a commuted dower, which was a cash payment for the value of the dower interests. For Josephus’s estate (plaintiff), it was not possible to transfer a life estate in one-third of Josephus’s real property. Therefore, at the time of Josephus’s death, Frances had a legal right to either (1) accept her inheritance under the will or (2) receive her dower rights in cash. Frances elected to disclaim her inheritance and receive the cash. When Josephus’s estate filed its federal estate tax return, it claimed a marital deduction for the cash paid to Frances for her dower rights. The federal government (defendant) disallowed the deduction, arguing that the cash payment should be treated like the nondeductible, terminable life estate that it replaced rather than as a separate, nonterminable transfer. The estate petitioned for a new determination, and the district court ruled that the cash transfer qualified for the marital deduction. The government appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Butzner, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership