First of Michigan Corp. v. Bramlet
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
141 F.3d 260 (1998)
From September 1989 through August 1991, Carlton and Dolores Bramlet (defendants) invested $62,000 in an Individual Retirement Account (IRA) with First of Michigan Corp. (First of Michigan) (plaintiff) through broker Michael Sobol (plaintiff). The Bramlets were residents of Florida, but they had met with Sobol in Michigan and made their investment decisions by calling Sobol in Michigan. All of the Bramlets’ investment transactions occurred in Michigan. By June 1991, the Bramlets’ IRA had lost more than half of its value. In June 1996, the Bramlets initiated an arbitration proceeding in Florida with the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD), alleging that First of Michigan and Sobol had failed to send them periodic statements, thereby precluding them from realizing and mitigating the extent of the losses in their IRA. First of Michigan and Sobol brought a declaratory action against the Bramlets in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, seeking to enjoin the Bramlets’ arbitration proceeding on the ground that NASD rules prohibited arbitration claims relating to investments more than six years old. The Bramlets moved to dismiss the federal lawsuit for improper venue. The district court dismissed the suit, reasoning that venue in Michigan was improper, because the “most substantial event” underlying the plaintiffs’ claim was the Bramlets’ initiation of the arbitration proceeding in Florida. First of Michigan and Sobol appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Cole, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.