First Pacific Bancorp, Inc. v. Helfer

224 F.3d 1117 (2000)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

First Pacific Bancorp, Inc. v. Helfer

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
224 F.3d 1117 (2000)

  • Written by Robert Cane, JD

Facts

The Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989 (the financial-reform act) provided the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) (defendant) broad powers and duties to serve as receiver for distressed banks. First Pacific Bancorp, Incorporated (Bancorp) (plaintiff) owned First Pacific Bank, a distressed bank. In 1990, the California Department of Banking appointed the FDIC as receiver for First Pacific Bank. About six years later, the FDIC provided Bancorp with a notice that it was ending its receivership of First Pacific Bank. The FDIC gave Bancorp two pages of unaudited financial information covering the period of receivership. Bancorp requested more information, and the FDIC provided an additional four pages of financial information. Bancorp and its shareholders (plaintiffs) sued the FDIC, seeking an accounting of First Pacific Bank’s financial condition during the time the FDIC served as receiver as required by § 1821(d)(15)(B) of the financial-reform act. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the FDIC, finding that no private right of action existed. Bancorp and its shareholders appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Molloy, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership