First Union National Bank of South Carolina v. Soden

511 S.E.2d 372, 333 S.C. 554 (1998)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

First Union National Bank of South Carolina v. Soden

South Carolina Court of Appeals
511 S.E.2d 372, 333 S.C. 554 (1998)

Facts

In 1978 Josephine Clary amended her trust to give her husband, Joseph Pierce (defendant), the trust income upon her death. Once Joseph either died or remarried, the trust was to terminate, with the principal divided 40 percent to Clary’s niece, Margaret Ann Soden, 30 percent to the children of Clary’s nephew Ralph Henry Walters, Jr. (collectively, the Soden group, including Margaret together with Ralph’s children) (plaintiffs), and 30 percent to Joseph’s daughter, Nancy Pierce (defendant). First Union National Bank of South Carolina (First Union) (plaintiff) was the successor trustee. Josephine died in 1980. In 1984 Joseph married Elizabeth McMillan. Joseph kept his marriage mostly a secret, and he continued to file taxes as a single person. Although Joseph denied telling Nancy that he remarried and Nancy denied knowing, Nancy testified she knew Joseph and Elizabeth lived together and instructed her children to call Elizabeth grandma. In 1992 Nancy’s ex-husband, Roy Lee Cashwell, told Margaret that Joseph had remarried. Roy testified he and Nancy discussed Joseph’s remarriage, and Joseph filled out a form calling Elizabeth his wife. Margaret’s attorney sent First Union a copy of the marriage certificate. First Union filed an action naming as defendants the Soden group, Joseph, and Nancy, who represented herself. The parties filed crossclaims and counterclaims against each other. The master found Joseph was liable to First Union for $88,669, the amount he received after his marriage. The master found Nancy was only entitled to a 30 percent share of the 1984 value of the trust, not a 30 percent share of its 1992 value, due to her unclean hands in failing to notify First Union of Joseph’s marriage. Finally, the Soden group was awarded $88,669 from First Union. The master dismissed a civil conspiracy claim against Nancy and denied the Soden group’s common-fund-doctrine claim for attorney’s fees from Nancy. All parties but Joseph appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Huff, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 834,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership