From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...
Fischer v. First Chicago Capital Markets, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
195 F.3d 279 (1999)
First Chicago Capital Markets, Inc. (FCCM) (defendant) hired Thomas Fischer (plaintiff) to help develop a health care accounts-securitization program. The parties signed a letter of understanding under which FCCM agreed to pay Fischer based on an hourly fee. The letter also stated that, if the program was successful, FCCM hoped to move to an ongoing consulting agreement on a fee basis and that FCCM was thinking of a sliding fee scale from between 8 and 5 basis points (between .008 and .005 percent of the program’s value) per year. The program was completed, and two bonds totaling $32 million were issued to support the program. When the original, hourly fee arrangement expired, Fischer continued to consult on the program. Fischer invoiced FCCM for $25,600 after the first year, which he calculated by multiplying 8 basis points by $32 million. When FCCM refused to pay, Fischer sued for breach of contract and promissory estoppel. Fischer claimed that, both before and after the letter of understanding was signed, FCCM assured him that he would continue to consult on the program in exchange for basis points for the duration of the two bonds. The district court dismissed Fischer’s suit, finding that the letter of understanding was not definite enough to create an enforceable contract and that the promissory estoppel claim was defeated by the Illinois statute of frauds. Fischer appealed, arguing that he was entitled to payment based on the parties’ oral agreement.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Wood, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 218,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.