Fischer v. Grinsbergs

252 N.W.2d 619 (1977)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Fischer v. Grinsbergs

Supreme Court of Nebraska
252 N.W.2d 619 (1977)

Facts

In 1945, the owners of two adjacent lots constructed a driveway from their street to their respective garages. This driveway was located on both owners’ lots. It is unknown whether permission was granted by either owner when use of the driveway began. However, the driveway was used by the owners of both lots, uninterrupted until 1975. At this time, the owners of the two lots were Viola Fischer (plaintiff) and Valdemars and Parsala Grinsbergs (defendants). In 1972, a survey was conducted where the Grinsbergs discovered where exactly the boundaries of their property lied. In 1975, the Grinsbergs constructed a fence along this property boundary. Ms. Fischer brought suit, as she was then unable to access her garage. The trial court determined that the Grinsbergs were allowed to construct the fence, because a prescriptive easement did not exist. Ms. Fischer petitioned for certiorari to the Supreme Court of Nebraska.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Brodkey, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 744,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 744,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 744,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership